Research in Dance and Physical Education

Current Issue

Research in Dance and Physical Education - Vol. 4 , No. 2

[ Article ]
Research in Dance and Physical Education - Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.1-16
ISSN: 2586-1034 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2020
Received 03 Jan 2020 Revised 30 Apr 2020 Accepted 15 Jun 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26584/RDPE.2020.6.4.1.1

Abilities and Structure of Dance Appreciation: Based on Dance Critics Interviews
Ebe DAIGO*
University of Tsukuba, Assistant Professor, Japan

Correspondence to : *Email address: daigo.ebe.ga@u.tsukuba.ac.jp


Abstract

In 2013, the Japan Sports Association announced the "National Sports Promotion Plan in the 21st century—Sports Promotion 2013." Two words that have not been seen in previous plans appear in the latest edition: “analysis” and “criticism.” These words can be regarded as referencing a new direction to more deeply experience sports. The purpose of this study is to reveal the abilities that are reflected in the growth process of the dance critic and to present a model of dance appreciation which includes the critics. This survey took place from December 2013 to February 2014. Subjects were questioned in a semi-structured interview. They were asked to recall the circumstances that led them to become dance critics. The critics all shared three abilities prior to attaining their profession: the ability to formalize, physical compressive ability, and concentration power. The ability to formalize is an intention to express one’s impression of an experience to others. Physical empathy ability is displayed by two people who have prior dance experience, who can reflect physical exercise by drawing from their own experiences. Concentration power is to feel very close, or immersed, in the experience. Diversification of the concept involves the compulsion to write criticism. Explanatory power, objective ability, analytical skills, and information organizing abilities are concepts that are very similar: they all involve information-intensive abilities, response capabilities, and evaluation abilities. The ability to collect and organize information has changed since the subjects of the study began as critics. Current concepts connect knowledge collection to meaning. Further, critics react with one after another in this new stimulus. The ability to evaluate a work and its producer has become more important. Language and debate skills are also necessary.


Keywords: dance appreciation, dance critics, audience abilities, dance management

Additional statement

This manuscript uses a part of the data of the first author's doctoral thesis written only in Japanese in 2015, Waseda Univeirsty, Tokyo. Also supported by Editage by CACTUS in native English check process.


References
1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press
2. Abe K. (2006). Consumed Sports: a program for the sociology of sport in Japan. Cross-cultural business and cultural studies 11:1-16
3. Best D. (1985). Sport Is Not Art. William J. M. and Klaus V. M., Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign: 531
4. Best D. (1988). The Aesthetic in Sport. William J. M. and Klaus V. M., Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign: 480
5. Lin H. & Kato H. (2010). Abilities Required for Product Designers and their Growth Process. Design Management Journal, 57(2):67-74
6. Higuchi S. (1987) Aesthetic of sport. Fumai-dou, Tokyo: 85
7. Higuchi K. (2014). Quantitative Text Analysis for Social Research. Nakanishi-ya, Tokyo
8. Kinoshita Y. M-GTA: Modified grounded Theory approach. Tokyo: Koubundou; 2003.
9. Lorin W. Anderson and David R. Krathwohl (edit) (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman
10. Japan Sport Association (2018). The promotion of national sports of 21st century-Sport promotion guideline 2008-, https://www.japan-sports.or.jp[PDF] /Portals/0/data0/about/pdf/jasa_sportpromotionplan2018.pdf)
11. Japan Sport Association (2013). The promotion of national sports of 21st century-Sport promotion guideline 2013-,https://www.japan-sports.or.jp[PDF]
12. Nishiwaki Y. (2013) Review of professional research from an organizational research perspective. The academic association of organizational science, Tokyo. Hakutou shobou: 95-140
13. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
14. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Sano S. (2015). Sports Literacy -Media and Sports Literacy-, Chapter 3, Sobun: 108-125
16. Shigematsu D. (2009). A conceptual study on “seeing” sports::through Hasumi's sports criticism and Wittgenstein's arguments on aspect. The Philosophic study of sport and physical education 31(1): 27-44
17. Tonyi .Ja Ticlline (2005). Dervin's Sense-Making. Theories of information behavior / edited by Karen E. Fisher, Sanda Erdelez, and Lynne McKechnie.
18. Wertz S. K. (1988). Context and Intention in Sport and Art. William J. M. and Klaus V. M., Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign: 525
19. Wertz S. K. (1985). Aesthetic Creativity in Sport. Vanderwerken D. L. and Wertz S. K., Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth: 517